Department of Government Efficiency, Donald Trump, Federal Reserve, government spending, U.S. Courts, U.S. Government

Trump directed to release all funds after defying court order

Trump’s most aggressive policy moves have been paused in federal courts across the country as judges weigh legality

The Trump administration must immediately unfreeze all US$3 trillion in federal funds, a judge ruled Monday, finding it violated his temporary restraining order by keeping some of the dollars paused.

Blue state attorneys general showed evidence that the administration is still refusing to let funds flow, despite the federal judge’s Jan. 31 order to pause the administration’s plan. The Trump administration must ask McConnell for permission to pause funds in specific cases, the judge said.

Financial Post
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman, and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
  • Daily content from Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Enjoy additional articles per month.
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors.
THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
  • Enjoy additional articles per month
  • Get email updates from your favourite authors

Sign In or Create an Account

or
View more offers
If you are a Home delivery print subscriber, online access is included in your subscription. Activate your Online Access Now

“The Defendants now plea that they are just trying to root out fraud,” Chief Judge John J. McConnell Jr. in the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island wrote Monday. “But the freezes in effect now were a result of the broad categorical order, not a specific finding of possible fraud.”

The “broad categorical and sweeping” funding freeze is likely unconstitutional and is irreparably harming “a vast portion of this country,” McConnell wrote. “Persons who make private determinations of the law and refuse to obey an order generally risk criminal contempt even if the order is ultimately ruled incorrect,” he said, quoting the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Maness v. Meyers.

The states in a Feb. 7 filing wrote that greenhouse gas reduction, air monitoring, solar energy, dementia research, and HIV prevention programs were among those still locked out of receiving federal dollars.

The administration must immediately clear all hurdles to restoring the funds until the court decides on the state’s motion for a preliminary injunction, the judge said.

He singled out as examples funds appropriated in the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Improvement and Jobs Act, as well as funds for institutes and executive agencies, such as the National Institutes of Health.

McConnell took issue with the administration’s position in a court filing that his order had ambiguous terms that intruded on the executive branch’s authority.

“The Court’s TRO is clear and unambiguous in its scope and effect,” McConnell wrote in a footnote.

Trump’s most aggressive policy moves have been paused in federal courts across the country as judges weigh their legality.

Bloomberg.com